Did you get the memo? I didn’t. Those kooky big time movie producers have changed the rules when it comes to sequels. In particular, the standard “2” (or the more fancypants “II”), are no longer good enough. Nope. It is now customary to slap the word “The” at the beginning of the title, therefore indicating that this installment of the franchise is the end all, be all of all sequels, prequels, and trilogies.
Case in point: a little film called The Final Destination. Perhaps you’ve seen a trailer or a movie poster for it. Thing is, it’s really Final Destination 4. I ask you, why not just call it Final Destination IV? Or Final Destination: Part 4? Or Final Destination: This Time It’s REALLY Over? Do the movie studios think that the target audience for cheesy horror films actually cares what the title is? The people who pay to see gore-fests like these will still see the film regardless of the name or number of the sequel. They want to see a person dying in new, creative and vomit-inducing ways…the title is inconsequential.

Which came first?
Or, another new sneaky tactic is to throw in an ampersand (there’s a word you don’t see every day) in and voila…you have yourself a new title. I am, of course, referring to part 4 of The Fast and the Furious, simply renamed Fast & Furious. Huh? Well, then it must be about a totally new and different group of fast and furious people, right? Oh, no. It stars all the same characters as the original film. How dumb is that? A better question might be, how dumb are the people who will pay to see a movie about the same topic, starring the same characters, with, essentially, the same title? Are they so dense that they forgot they saw it the first time it was out?

Seeing double?
I wasn’t going to say anything about all this silliness. Really. I was going to just keep my big yap shut, but, after what I just saw, I simply can’t keep mum any longer.
A bus just drove by with a poster for Halloween II on it. I’m sorry, is it 1981? Is Jamie Lee Curtis in the film? NO? Then it’s NOT Halloween II. Technically, it’s Halloween IX. So, why not just call it that? Why have two films with the SAME exact name? Oh, and here’s the best part. It IS the identical script as the original Halloween II. I mean, I grasp the concept of remaking a classic film, usually ending in disastrous results (e.g., Planet of the Apes, Psycho, The Omen, and, by far the worst remake EVER…The Wicker Man), but Halloween II? Hardly what I would classify as a “classic”.

One of these things is EXACTLY like the other.
Are we really this hard up for entertainment?
Personally, I think the trouble all started with those damn Star Wars prequels. As if the movies themselves weren’t awful enough (need I remind you of “Jar Jar Binks”?), they screwed up the whole numbering system for the original Star Wars films. At one point, they even renamed Star Wars and started calling it Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope. I’m sorry. You CAN’T do that! It’s just…WRONG. Yes, yes, I understand it technically WAS Episode IV, and it even says so in the opening crawl of the film, but that was NOT the original title. If it was, no one would’ve seen it. People don’t like long, complicated movie titles…it confuses them…
*A LIGHT BULB APPEARS ABOVE MY HEAD*
Duh. Well, at least I answered my own question. The “Entertainment Industry” thinks we are a bunch of dim-witted idiots who can’t possibly remember more than two or three words of a title, much less what NUMBER follows it. In fact, they’re banking on it. Judging from the fact that The Final Destination was the top grossing film this past weekend with $28.3 million, and crushed Halloween II which only made $17.4 million, I suppose someone knows what they’re doing. (But then again, how do you explain the unbelievable success of the Harry Potter films?)
By the way, news is that they’re going to make a third installment of the Bad Boys series. Tentative titles being considered are: The Bad Boys, Bad Boy & Bad Boy, and (my favorite) Bad, Bad, Bad Boys. (No, not really.)
Share: Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | StumbleUpon | Reddit | Blinklist | Twitter | Technorati | Newsvine | Permalink



























